Bell v. Williams
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 VINCENT KEITH BELL, Case No. 18-cv-01245-SI
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: ADMINISTRATIVE
v. EXHAUSTION
SERGEANT YVETTE WILLIAMS, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 191, 199, 204 Defendants.
12 Defendants contend that plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies for (1) his First Amendment Retaliation claim under 42 U.S.C. §1983 that the discipline imposed and carried out by Sergeant Williams was retaliation for Mr. Bells’ sexual harassment grievance against Deputy Leung; and (2) his claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 that he was denied reasonable accommodations related to toileting when he was placed in the safety cell. The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996) (“PLRA”), amended 42 U.S.C. § 1997e to provide that “[n]o action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under [42 U.S.C. § 1983], or any other Federal law, by a prisoner…