Whitaker

Whitaker v. Ben Bridge-Jeweler, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20225:21-cv-00808California1,937 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 BRIAN WHITAKER, Case No. 5:21-cv-00808-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS UNRUH ACT CLAIM

v.

BEN BRIDGE-JEWELER, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 12 Defendant.

Defendant Ben Bridge-Jeweler, Inc. moves this Court to decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff Brian Whitaker’s California Unruh Act claim. See Motion to Dismiss Unruh Act Cause of Action (“Mot.”), Dkt. No. 12. On May 5, 2021, Plaintiff filed an opposition, to which Defendant filed a reply. See Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (“Opp.”), Dkt. No. 16; Defendant Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition (“Reply”), Dkt. No. 19. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss and declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s Unruh Act claim.1 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is a California resident with physical disabilities. Complaint for Damages and Injunctive Relief…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.