Geary

Geary v. Parexel International Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20225:19-cv-07322California5,019 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 WILLIAM JOHN GEARY, Case No. 5:19-cv-07322-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

v.

PAREXEL INTERNATIONAL Re: Dkt. No. 122 CORPORATION, et al., 12 Defendants.

13 Plaintiff William John Geary III, proceeding pro se, brings this action against Defendant Parexel International Corporation (“Parexel”) and its individual officers, executives, and directors (collectively, “the Individual Defendants”), asserting the following claims: (1) retaliation in violation of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”), 18 U.S.C. § 1514A against all Defendants; (2) retaliation in violation of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”), 15 U.S.C. § 78u-6 against all Defendants; (3) retaliation through wrongful termination in violation of California Labor Code § 1102.5 against Parexel1; and (4) wrongful termination in violation of public policy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.