Zwerling

Zwerling v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 14, 20225:19-cv-03622California7,354 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 PHILIP ZWERLING, Case No. 5:19-cv-03622-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS

v.

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 42 Defendants.

13 Plaintiff Philip Zwerling asserts claims against Defendants Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) and Does 1-10 for (1) fraud by omission, and (2) violation of the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2301 et seq. Dkt. No. 39. Before the Court is Ford’s motion for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c). Not. of Mot. and Mot. to Dismiss Plf.’s First Am. Compl. under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c) by Def. Ford Motor Co. (“Mot.”), Dkt. No. 42. The Court finds the motion appropriate for decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). Having considered the parties’ written submissions, the Court GRANTS the motion with leave to amend. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.