Lenk

Lenk v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20225:20-cv-08094California3,702 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

\ 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 KENNETH LAWRENCE LENK, Case No. 20-cv-08094-BLF

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION FOR PREVAILING PARTY

ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND COSTS

MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC., [Re: ECF 36] Defendant.

14 Following dismissal of this action – the fourth that pro se Plaintiff Kenneth Lenk (“Lenk”) has filed against his former employer, Defendant Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (“MPS”) – MPS filed the present Motion for Prevailing Party Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (“Fees Motion”). See Fees Motion, ECF 34. Plaintiff Kenneth Lawrence Lenk (“Lenk”) has filed an opposition and MPS has filed a reply. See Opp., ECF 39; Reply, ECF 40. The Court has vacated the hearing that was noticed for March 24, 2022 and submitted the motion for decision without oral argument. See Order Submitting Fees Mot., ECF 46. MPS’s Fees Motion is GRANTED IN PART…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.