Sayles

Sayles v. Alameda County, Superior Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20223:21-cv-08243California480 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 WALTER SAYLES, Case No. 21-cv-08243-JD

Petitioner,

ORDER RE DISMISSAL

v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 6 ALAMEDA COUNTY, SUPERIOR

COURT,

11 Respondent.

12 Walter Sayles, a California prisoner, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner was convicted in Alameda County, which is in this district, so venue is proper here. See 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). DISCUSSION STANDARD OF REVIEW This Court may entertain a petition for writ of habeas corpus “in behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court only on the ground that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a); Rose v. Hodges, 423 U.S. 19, 21 (1975). Habeas corpus petitions must meet heightened pleading requirements. McFarland v. Scott, 512 U.S. 849, 856 (1994). An application for a federal writ of habeas corpus filed by a prisoner who is in state…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.