Riley

Austin v. Riley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20223:21-cv-09347California474 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN, Case No. 21-cv-09347-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: APPLICATION TO

v. REFUND FILING FEE

KERRI RILEY, Re: Dkt. Nos. 28, 30 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff filed his complaint on December 2, 2021 along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Dkt. Nos. 1, 2.) In the application, Plaintiff responded to nearly all the required questions with “not disclosed.” The Court ordered Plaintiff to file a completed application with information sufficient to support a finding that he is unable to pay the required filing fee, or otherwise to pay the fee. (Dkt. No. 4.) Plaintiff paid the filing fee on January 1, 2022. (Dkt. No. 9.) On March 11, 2022, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file proof of service by April 11, 2022. (Dkt. No. 24.) On March 16, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion to withdraw his case, (Dkt. No. 26), and the Court issued an order acknowledging Plaintiff’s voluntary dismissal under Federal Rule of …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.