Doe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JANE DOE, Case No. 19-cv-03310-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: UBER’S MOTIONS TO

v. COMPEL FURTHER DEPOSITIONS

UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 192, 193 Defendants.

12 On February 9 and 10, 2022, Uber took the depositions of Plaintiff’s boyfriend and Plaintiff, respectively. These depositions had been rescheduled at Plaintiff’s counsel’s request from their original date in January 2022. Uber contends that Plaintiff’s counsel’s improper objections impeded its ability to conduct the depositions and thus moves to compel further depositions of both Plaintiff and her boyfriend. (Dkt. Nos. 192, 193.) Having considered the parties’ briefs and the relevant legal authority, reviewed the deposition transcripts and the video of Plaintiff’s deposition, the Court GRANTS Uber’s motions as set forth below. DISCUSSION During a deposition, an attorney may properly state objections “concisely in a …