Bernard

Bernard v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20224:20-cv-05173California5,727 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FAY B., Case No. 20-cv-05173-JSW

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT AND GRANTING

ANDREW M. SAUL, DEFENDANT’S CROSS-MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 21, 22

18 Now before the Court are the cross-motions for summary judgment filed by Plaintiff, Fay 19 B. (“Plaintiff”), and Andrew M. Saul, the Commissioner of Social Security Administration 20 (“Commissioner”). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-5, the motions have been submitted on the 21 papers without oral argument. The Court has considered the parties’ papers, the administrative 22 23 1 The Court has partially redacted Plaintiff’s name in compliance with Federal Rule of 24 Civil Procedure 5.2(c)(2)(B) and the recommendation of the Committee on Court Administration and Case Management of the Judicial Conference of the United States. Kilolo Kijakazi became the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.