Harris

Harris v. Door Dash, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20223:21-cv-09445California1,277 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KEVIN JEROME HARRIS, Case No. 21-cv-09445-JSC

Plaintiff,

SCREENING ORDER PURSUANT TO

v. 28 U.S.C. § 1915

DOOR DASH, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 7 Defendant.

12 Upon review of Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, the Court determined that it did not contain a short and plain statement of the claim and the grounds upon which it rests, as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8. (Dkt. Nos. 1, 6.) The Court gave Plaintiff the opportunity to amend the complaint, and now reviews the amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Dkt. No. 7.) COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS Plaintiff brings claims for violations of his rights to minimum wage and overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). Plaintiff worked as a “dasher” for Defendant between November 2020 and November 2021. (Id. ¶¶ 6, 8.) He worked in 13 states. Over that time, Plaintiff performed 1,523 deliveries for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.