Flores

Flores v. Murphy

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 22, 20225:21-cv-07851California429 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 DAVIN WILLIE FLORES, Case No. 21-cv-07851-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

AMENDED COMPLAINT

E. MURPHY, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 16 Defendants.

13 Pro se plaintiff Davin Willie Flores, Jr., a state prisoner, filed this civil rights action against defendants “Classification Sergeant” E. Murphy, “Classification” Deputy E. Arteaga, and “West County and Martinez Detention facility medical staff” based on their actions while Mr. Flores was housed at the Martinez Detention Facility (“MDF”). Dkt. No. 1. On February 24, 2022, the Court screened the complaint and found it failed to state a claim as to all named defendants. Dkt. No. 15. Mr. Flores was granted leave to file an amended complaint to correct the deficiencies no later than March 25, 2022. Id. On March 21, 2022, Mr. Flores filed a request for an extension of time to file an amended complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.