Brooks
Brooks v. Lozano
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JERMAINE DARNELL BROOKS, Case No. 20-cv-01711-VC (PR)
Petitioner, ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR
DISCOVERY AND FOR
v. EVIDENTIARY HEARING; DENYING
PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS
JARED D. LOZANO, CORPUS; DENYING CERTIFICATE
OR APPEALABILITY
Respondent. Re: Dkt. No.
Jermaine Darnell Brooks filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Brooks did not challenge his conviction, but asserted constitutional challenges to his sentence of life without the possibility of parole (“LWOP”). On December 10, 2021, the court issued an order denying two claims but did not rule on Brooks’ equal protection claim pertaining to California Criminal Code § 3051. The court requested further briefing on: (1) Brooks’ argument that he is “actually innocent” of his sentence; (2) Brooks’ argument that his equal protection claim is an as-applied challenge to § 3051; and (3) Brooks’ motions for discovery and an evidentiary hearing. On January 4, 2022, the respondent filed his supplemental brief. Brooks has not filed a supplemental traverse. In its…