Austin v. ABC Legal
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN, Case No. 21-cv-09076-SI
Plaintiff,
ORDER (1) GRANTING
v. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT'S ABC LEGAL, MOTION TO STRIKE Defendant.
RE: DKT. NOS. 18, 26, 27,
15 Before the Court is defendant ABC Legal’s motion to dismiss George Jarvis Austin’s 16 complaint for failure to state a claim under Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(b)(6), or in the alternative, a motion 17 for a more definite statement. Dkt. No. 18. The Court previously determined that oral argument 18 was not necessary to resolve the matter and vacated the hearing set for February 4, 2022 per Civil 19 Local Rule 7-1(b). Having considered the arguments raised in the parties’ written submissions, the 20 Court GRANTS ABC Legal’s motion to dismiss the complaint. Austin is granted leave to amend. 21 The amended complaint is due no later than April 10, 2022. 22 Also before the Court is ABC Legal’s motion to strike Austin’s amended complaint.…