Flowers

Flowers v. Foulk

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20224:14-cv-00589California831 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 Case No. 14-cv-00589 CW JOSEPH J. FLOWERS,

ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE

Petitioner, OF APPEALABILITY v. (Re: Dkt. Nos. 144, 149)

FRED FOULK,

Respondent.

15 On March 18, 2022, the Ninth Circuit remanded this action to the Court for the limited purpose of granting or denying a certificate of appealability (COA) with respect to its order of September 16, 2021. See Docket No. 149. In that order, the Court denied Petitioner’s motion to vacate the judgment under Rules 60(b)(1), (b)(2), (b)(3), and (b)(6) and “reopen” his habeas corpus petition on the basis that “Respondent committed fraud on the Court and Petitioner by leading the Court and Petitioner to believe, incorrectly, that Respondent ‘had provided a particular set of transcripts’ for proceedings that took place on December 9, 2009.’” Order at 2, Docket No. 144. Petitioner argued that this Court’s ruling that Claim 4 of his federal habeas corpus petition…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.