Hampton
Hampton v. State of California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA San Francisco Division MICHAEL HAMPTON, et al., Case No. 21-cv-03058-LB
Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
v. Re: ECF No. 66 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Defendants. 16 The defendants moved under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) for reconsideration of the court’s order denying the defendants’ motion to dismiss. They raise two grounds for reconsideration: (1) the court did not hold the plaintiffs to their burden of establishing a clearly established constitutional when it analyzed qualified immunity, and (2) it did not consider whether the plaintiffs alleged sufficient facts to show that the defendants’ conduct was not immune under state law.1 The court can decide the motion for reconsideration without oral argument. Civ. L. R. 7- 1(b). The court denies the motion generally because there was no error. The court also amends its earlier dismissal order to expand its analysis.2 25 26 27 1 Mot. –…