Johnson v. City of San Jose

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 20225:21-cv-01849California10,847 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 KYLE JOHNSON, Case No. 21-cv-01849-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART WITH

v. LEAVE TO AMEND IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al., DISMISS Defendants. [Re: ECF No. 53]

12 Plaintiff Kyle Johnson alleges that he was seriously injured when Officer James Adgar of the San Jose Police Department fired a less lethal projectile weapon at him during the George Floyd protests in San Jose, California on May 30, 2020. Johnson brings his lawsuit against the City of San Jose (“the City”), Officer Adgar, and other unnamed police officers, asserting claims for battery and negligence and violations of 28 U.S.C. § 1983, the California Bane Act, and the California Public Records Act. Defendants have moved to dismiss the First Amended Complaint. ECF No. 53 (“MTD”); see also ECF No. 59 (“Reply”). Johnson opposes the motion. ECF No. 58 (“Opp.”). The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.