Doordash, Inc. v. City and County of San Francisco
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DOORDASH, INC., et al., Case No. 21-cv-05502-EMC
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN AMENDED COMPLAINT
FRANCISCO,
Docket No. 28 Defendant. 12 13 Plaintiffs DoorDash, Inc. (“DoorDash”) and Grubhub Inc. (“Grubhub”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed this action against Defendant City and County of San Francisco (the “City”) alleging that an enacted ordinance—which caps the commissions that third-party platforms, such as Plaintiffs, can charge restaurants to 15%—is unlawful. See Docket No. 1 (“Complaint or Compl.”). After the City filed its motion to dismiss the Complaint, Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Complaint. See Docket No. 25 (“FAC”). Pending before the Court is the City’s motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint. See Docket No. 28 (“Mot.”). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS IN PART…