Brooks

Brooks v. Thomson Reuters Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20223:21-cv-01418California706 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CAT BROOKS, et al., Case No. 21-cv-01418-EMC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER RE PARTIES’ JOINT

v. DISCOVERY LETTER BRIEF OF

MARCH 24, 2022

THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION, Docket No. 81 Defendant.

12 13 The parties raise a dispute over the procedure by which Defendant will comply with Plaintiffs’ discovery request for Defendant’s data-licensing agreements for CLEAR with third parties. Defendant does not dispute the relevance of the requested documents, and agrees it will produce at least some of the agreements. However, Defendant notes that “over 80 agreements include confidentiality restrictions. . . . Some require advance notice before disclosure of their terms. . . Some (but not all) allow for production without notice following a court order.” Docket No. 81 at 2. Defendant proposes informing those third parties of Plaintiffs’ request, waiting to see if any of the third parties object, and then bringing any disputes that remain to the Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.