McHenry

McHenry v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20224:20-cv-06642California2,053 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KARL M.,

Case No. 20-cv-06642-DMR Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

KILOLO KIJAKAZI,

Re: Dkt. Nos. 25, 26 Defendant.

Plaintiff Karl M. moves for summary judgment to reverse the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s (the “Commissioner’s”) final administrative decision, which found Plaintiff not disabled and therefore denied his application for benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. [Docket No. 25.] The Commissioner cross-moves to affirm. [Docket No. 26.] For the reasons stated below, the court grants Plaintiff’s motion in part, denies the Commissioner’s motion, and remands this matter for further proceedings. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff filed an application for Social Security Disability Insurance (“SSDI”) benefits on May 17, 2018, alleging disability beginning November 15, 2017. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.