Saddozai

Saddozai v. Bolanos

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20225:18-cv-03972California449 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SHIKEB SADDOZAI,

Case No. 18-03972 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER ON REMAND;

REQUESTING DEFENDANT’S

v. COUNSEL TO IDENTIFY THE

SUCCESSOR FOR DECEASED

CARLOS BOLANOS, et al., DEFENDANT A. ARQUEZA

Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 16, 2019, the Court found the second amended 19 complaint, liberally construed, stated cognizable Eighth Amendment claims against 20 Defendant Sheriff A. Arqueza of San Mateo County. Dkt. No. 27 at 2-3. Plaintiff then 21 filed a third amended complaint on March 5, 2020. Dkt. No. 32. The Court granted leave 22 to amend the claims against Defendant Arqueza under the Fourteenth Amendment, but did 23 not address claims against newly named defendants, the Sheriff of San Mateo County and 24 the City of Redwood City. Dkt. No. 34. The Court screened the third amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.