Harris

Harris v. Atchley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20223:22-cv-00529California994 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL JAY HARRIS, Case No. 22-cv-00529-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. SECOND MOTION FOR A

TEMPORARY RESTRAINIING

MATTHEW ATCHLEY, et al., ORDER Defendants. Docket No.

12 13 This is a pro se prisoner’s civil rights action. Plaintiff Michael Harris alleges that he is “a convicted child rapist and molester 19 times over,” Docket No. 1 (“Complaint”) ¶ 43, and claims that his safety is put at risk by a potential transfer from sensitive needs custody at Salinas Valley State Prison to a non-designated yard at another facility, see generally, id. Mr. Harris filed a motion for a temporary restraining order (“TRO”), which this Court denied. See Docket Nos. 2, 10. The Court reasoned that, because there was no plan to transfer Mr. Harris, irreparable injury to him was only possible and not likely, which is insufficient to support the issuance of a TRO. See Docket No. 10 at 13 (citing cases); see…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.