Pollock

Pollock v. Federal Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20223:21-cv-09975California5,816 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 THOMAS POLLOCK, et al., Case No. 21-cv-09975-JCS Plaintiffs, 8 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE

FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, COMPLAINT

10 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 14

12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs Thomas Pollock and Eileen Tabios bring this action against Defendant Federal Insurance Company seeking compensation under a homeowners’ insurance policy purchased from Defendant on their home in St. Helena, California, which was severely damages in the 2020 Glass Fire. Presently before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike Complaint (“Motion”), in which Defendant argues, inter alia, that Plaintiffs’ claims are not ripe for adjudication because investigation of the insurance claim is ongoing and Plaintiffs have not supplied requested documents or completed examinations under oath (“EUOs”), as required under the policy. The Court finds that the Motion is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.