In re HIV Antitrust Litigation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20223:19-cv-02573California3,974 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 STALEY, et al., Case No. 19-cv-02573-EMC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO VACATE AETNA’S

VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

GILEAD SCIENCES, INC., et al., Docket No. 863 Defendants.

AETNA INC., RELATED TO

Plaintiff, Case No. 21-cv-09827-EMC v.

GILEAD SCIENCES, INC., et al., Docket No. 19 Defendants.

17 The pending motion concerns Aetna v. Gilead, No. C-21-9827 EMC, which is one of the cases related to the main Staley action. This case shall hereinafter be referred to as Aetna I. Aetna filed Aetna I in state court, but Gilead removed the case to federal court. Aetna then moved to remand. The same day that Gilead’s opposition to the remand motion was due, Aetna filed a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. Now pending before the Court is Gilead’s motion to vacate the voluntary dismissal. Having…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.