Rosenberg-Wohl

Rosenberg-Wohl v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20224:20-cv-09316California5,236 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KATHERINE ROSENBERG-WOHL, Case No. 20-cv-09316-DMR

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT

STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Re: Dkt. No. 33 11 Defendant. 12 Plaintiff Katherine Rosenberg-Wohl filed a complaint against State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”), alleging it breached her State Farm homeowner’s insurance policy. State Farm now moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) to dismiss the second amended complaint (“SAC”). [Docket No. 33.] This matter is suitable for resolution without a hearing. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the motion is granted. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Rosenberg-Wohl makes the following allegations in the SAC, all of which are taken as true for purposes of this motion. Rosenberg-Wohl owns a house that is insured by a State Farm homeowner’s policy. [Docket No. 32 (SAC) ¶ 1.] She has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.