Lemelle

Lemelle v. Rakitan

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20225:21-cv-09463California279 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL S. LEMELLE, Case No. 21-09463 BLF (PR)

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

v.

13 RAKITAN, et al., Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the officers at Salinas Valley State Prison (“S.V.S.P.”). Dkt. No. 1. The matter was originally assigned to Magistrate Judge Sallie Kim, who had Plaintiff’s consent. Dkt. No. 5. On February 22, 2022, Magistrate Judge Kim dismissed the complaint with leave to amend, to correct various deficiencies. Dkt. No. 7. Plaintiff was directed to file an amended complaint within twenty-eight days from the date the order was filed and advised that failure to respond would result in the dismissal of the action without further notice to Plaintiff. Id. at 3. When the deadline passed without a response from Plaintiff, the matter was reassigned to this Court on March 24, 2022, pursuant to Williams v. King, 875 F.3d 500, 502-05…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.