Maagdenberg

Maagdenberg v. Universal.one

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20224:21-cv-07398California1,866 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ROBERT MAAGDENBERG, Case No. 21-cv-07398-DMR

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL

v. ARBITRATION

UNIVERSAL.ONE, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 24 Defendants.

Plaintiff Robert Maagdenberg filed this action against his former employer Universal.One and Universal Health and Wellness Corp. (together, “Universal”) alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act and the California Labor Code. Universal now moves to compel arbitration and dismiss the case. [Docket No. 24.] This matter is suitable for resolution without a hearing. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the court grants the motion and administratively closes this action pending the decision of the arbitrator. I. BACKGROUND A. Allegations in the Complaint Universal is a “company that sells digital platforms to healthcare providers and insurance companies.” Compl. ¶¶ 2, 3. It hired Maagdenberg in November 2018 as a “business systems 22…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.