Mills

Brewster v. Mills

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20224:20-cv-03254California6,732 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CENIOUS BREWSTER, Case No. 20-cv-03254-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND

GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE

DANIEL T MILLS, et al., MOTIONS TO SEAL Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 42, 52, 61,

12 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Dkt. No. 42. The Court held a hearing on the motion. For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Cenious Brewster filed this action against the City and County of San Francisco and several officers at the San Francisco County Jail #5 in San Bruno, where Plaintiff was incarcerated. See Dkt. No. 33 (“TAC”). Plaintiff alleges that he was sexually harassed by Deputy Mills, and retaliated against both by Deputy Mills and the other individual Defendants for complaining about the harassment. As indicated below, many…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.