Franklin

Franklin v. McDonough

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20225:21-cv-06328California1,564 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 DAVID M. FRANKLIN, Case No. 21-cv-06328-VKD

Plaintiff, ORDER (1) GRANTING PRO BONO

COUNSEL’S MOTION TO

v. WITHDRAW AND (2) DENYING

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR FULL

DENIS MCDONOUGH, SCOPE REPRESENTATION Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 26, 29

13 On January 18, 2022, the Court referred this matter to the Federal Pro Se Program (“Program”) for the limited purpose of assisting plaintiff David Franklin in a settlement conference to be held by June 14, 2022. Dkt. Nos. 20, 23. The Program subsequently informed the Court that it found a volunteer attorney willing to undertake the representation of this matter. On January 27, 2022, the Court appointed attorney Dayme Sanchez of the Jones Day law firm as counsel for Mr. Franklin for the limited purpose of assisting him in a settlement conference. Dkt. No. 24. Ms. Sanchez now moves to withdraw as counsel and avers that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.