Regina Karasik-Tosk v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20223:20-cv-03101California4,787 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

R.K.T.,

Case No. 20-cv-03101-JCS Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO REMAND

KILOLO KIJAKAZI,

Re: Dkt. Nos. 26, 30 Defendant.

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff R.K.T.1 brought this action challenging the decision by Defendant the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”)2 finding that she was disabled and entitled to Social Security benefits beginning on November 11, 2015, rather than her alleged onset date of November 14, 2013. R.K.T. moves for summary judgment and an award of benefits under the Ninth Circuit’s credit-as-true rule, while the Commissioner, conceding at least some errors in the administrative decision, moves to remand for further proceedings. For the reasons discussed below, the Commissioner’s motion to remand is GRANTED, and R.K.T.’s motion is DENIED to the extent she seeks a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.