Diaz
Diaz v. Saul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 L. D., Case No. 20-cv-06906-VKD
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR
v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Re: Dkt. Nos. 19, 20 Defendant.
13 Plaintiff L.D.1 appeals a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”)2 denying her application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 401–433. L.D. contends that the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) erred in three respects. First, L.D. contends that the ALJ erred by rejecting, without specific and legitimate reasons, the limitations assessed by an examining physician and state- agency consultant. Second, L.D. contends that the ALJ failed to provide sufficient reasons for discounting her subjective testimony about her symptoms and limitations. Third, L.D. contends that the ALJ erred in finding at step 5 that there exist a sufficient number of jobs…