Solis

Solis v. Clean Harbors, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20223:20-cv-02660California4,675 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ABRAHAM SOLIS, Case No. 20-cv-02660-AGT

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

CLEAN HARBORS, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 55 Defendants.

12 Defendants Aerotek, Inc. and Clean Harbors Industrial Services, Inc. (“Clean Harbors”), as the prevailing parties in this negligence action, move for an award of $75,000 in attorneys’ fees from plaintiff Abraham Solis. Dkt. 55, Mot. Solis opposes, arguing that the contractual attorneys’ fees provision defendants rely on is unenforceable and inapplicable, and the requested amount of fees is unreasonable. Dkt. 56, Opp. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants defendants’ motion. I. BACKGROUND On December 13, 2018, Solis signed a three-page employment agreement with Aerotek, a staffing agency, for a temporary work assignment with Aerotek’s client, Clean Harbors. See Dkt. 36-4, Employment Agreement. The Employment Agreement, which was drafted by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.