Threde

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 A1 ON TRACK SLIDING DOOR REPAIR Case No. 21-cv-03013-SI AND INSTALLATION, INC., et al., 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: DISCOVERY 12 v. Re: Dkt. No. 60

BRANDREP LLC,

14 Defendant. 15 The parties have submitted a discovery dispute to the Court. Dkt. No. 60. The parties disagree about whether defendant should be required to produce records of telemarketing calls placed on its behalf to potential class members. Plaintiffs state that this discovery is relevant to class certification issues such as numerosity and commonality, as well as defendant’s vicarious liability defense. Defendant objects to this discovery as a guise by plaintiffs to seek a new class representative. Plaintiffs deny that they are seeking a replacement plaintiff, and they state that they are amenable to having defendant produce the data with nondescript labels (i.e. Contact 1, Contact 2, Contact 3, etc.). The Court agrees with plaintiffs that the discovery at issue is relevant. See Webb v. …