Facebook, Inc. v. OnLineNic Inc
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 FACEBOOK, INC., et al., Case No. 19-cv-07071-SI
Plaintiffs,
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT
v. 35.CN'S MOTION TO BIFURCATE
ONLINENIC INC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 213 Defendants.
13 14 On February 25, 2022, defendant Xiamen 35.com Internet Technology Co., LTD (“35.CN”) filed the instant motion to bifurcate. Having reviewed the parties’ papers, the Court previously VACATED the April 1, 2022 hearing pursuant to Local Rule 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, defendant 35.CN’s motion is DENIED. 19 BACKGROUND The Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) alleges defendant OnlineNIC, a California corporation with its principal place of business in San Leandro, California, is a domain name registrar that sells, registers and transfers domain names for third parties. Dkt. No. 109 ¶ 9 (SAC). The SAC alleges defendant ID Shield, is a Hong Kong, China, limited company that provides a type…