Lindow

Lindow v. Conservatorship of Carl E. Lindow

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20225:20-cv-07555California3,870 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ROBERT O LINDOW, Case No. 5:20-cv-07555-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER RE MOTIONS TO DISMISS

v. 10 Re: Dkt. Nos. 27, 28 TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, et al., Defendants.

Before the Court are Defendants Tani Cantil-Sakauye and the Santa Clara County Superior Court’s motion to dismiss and Defendants Darren Wallace, Messner Reeves LLP, Rebecca Weisman, and Bonnie Ross’s motion to dismiss. Having considered the Parties’ papers, the Court GRANTS the respective motions to dismiss.1 I. BACKGROUND Pro se Plaintiff Robert Lindow was designated as a vexatious litigant in state court proceedings in February 2021 and now challenges the constitutionality of California’s vexatious litigant statute. See Counter-Complaint (“Compl.”) ¶¶ 98–125, 150–161, Dkt. No. 1. Plaintiff asserts his claims against Chief Justice Tani G. Cantil-Sakauye and the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara (the “State Defendants”) and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.