Metaxas

Metaxas v. Gateway Bank F.S.B.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20223:20-cv-01184California3,474 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 POPPI METAXAS, Case No. 20-cv-01184-EMC (DMR)

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON JOINT DISCOVERY

v. LETTER

GATEWAY BANK F.S.B., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 60 Defendants.

The parties filed a joint discovery letter brief in which Plaintiff Poppi Metaxas moves to supplement the administrative record. [Docket No. 60 (Jt. Letter).] This matter is suitable for resolution without a hearing. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the following reasons, the motion is denied. I. BACKGROUND This is an action for supplemental retirement benefits pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a). Metaxas filed this case against her former employer Defendant Gateway Bank, F.S.B. (“Gateway”) and the Gateway Bank Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“the Plan”). She alleges that she worked as the President and CEO of Gateway Bank and that she became “totally disabled under the terms of the plan” due to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.