Trim

Trim v. Mayvenn, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20223:20-cv-03917California3,471 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 LUCINE TRIM, Case No. 20-cv-03917-MMC

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT; VACATING HEARING

MAYVENN, INC.,

Defendant.

12 Before the Court is defendant Mayvenn, Inc.’s (“Mayvenn”) “Motion for Summary Judgment,” filed January 19, 2022. Plaintiff Lucine Trim (“Trim”) has filed opposition, to which Mayvenn has replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court deems the matter appropriate for decision on the parties’ respective written submissions, VACATES the hearing scheduled for April 8, 2022, and rules as follows. BACKGROUND In the operative complaint, the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), Trim alleges she has a cellular telephone number that has been registered on the National Do Not Call Registry (hereinafter, “NDNC Registry”) since December 3, 2019. (See FAC ¶¶ 45-46.) Trim alleges…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.