Brown

Clark v. Brown

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20225:21-cv-09230California1,721 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALPHONSO RAMON CLARK,

Case No. 21-09230 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH

LEAVE TO AMEND

v.

14 DR. MOLLY BROWN, et al.,

Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, who is currently housed at Napa State Hospital, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various medical professionals at the “Golden Gate Conrep.” Dkt. No. 1 at 2. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis will be addressed in a separate order. 22 DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any upon which relief may be granted or seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See id. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). Pro…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.