Manuel Ramos-Ayala v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 20, 202420-72194California634 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 20 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MANUEL RAMOS-AYALA, No. 20-72194

Petitioner, Agency No. A206-548-062

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted June 20, 2024**

Before: NGUYEN and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges, and PREGERSON,*** District Judge.

Manuel Ramos-Ayala, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of

a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal from

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Dean D. Pregerson, United States District Judge for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. an order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying cancellation of removal. We deny

the petition.

1. Ramos…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.