Kabede

Kabede v. California Governors Parole Board Hearing Dept.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 7, 20225:21-cv-05366California383 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WONDIYRAD KABEDE,

Case No. 21-05366 EJD (PR) Petitioner, ORDER OF TRANSFER v.

CA GOVERNOR’S PAROLE BOARD

14 HEARING DEP’T, et al., 15 Respondents.

17 Petitioner, a California prisoner, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging the denial of parole on January 9, 2020. Dkt. No. 15 at 4, 25. On November 9, 2021, the Court dismissed the petition with leave to amend, specifically with regards to the exhaustion of state judicial remedies. Dkt. No. 14. Petitioner filed an amended petition. Dkt. No. 15. Venue for a habeas action is proper in either the district of confinement or the district of conviction. 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d). Federal courts in California traditionally have chosen to hear petitions challenging a conviction or sentence in the district of conviction or sentencing. See Habeas L.R. 2254-3(b)(1); Dannenberg v. Ingle, 31 F.Supp. 767, 768 (N.D. Cal.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.