Ocampo
Ocampo v. Apple Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 JUSTIN OCAMPO, et al., Case No. 5:20-cv-05857-EJD
Plaintiffs, ORDER STAYING ACTION
v.
APPLE INC., Defendant.
At the Court’s request, the parties provided their respective positions on whether this action should be stayed pending the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Taleshpour v. Apple Inc., No. 21- 16282 (9th Cir. 2021). Dkt. Nos. 64, 65. Having considered the parties’ statements, the Court finds that a stay is appropriate. “A district court has the inherent power to stay its proceedings. This power to stay is ‘incidental to the power inherent in every court to control the disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for counsel, and for litigants.’” Fuller v. Amerigas Propane, Inc., No. 09-CV-2493-TEH, 2009 WL 2390358, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2009) (quoting Rivers v. Walt Disney Co., 980 F. Supp. 1358, 1360 (C.D. Cal. 1997)); see also Lockyer v. Mirant Corp., 398…