Wescott

Wescott v. Beresford Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20223:22-cv-00067California6,010 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CARL A. WESCOTT, Case No. 22-cv-00067-JSC

Plaintiff,

SCREENING ORDER PURSUANT TO

v. 28 U.S.C. § 1915

BERESFORD CORPORATION, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 1 Defendants.

12 Carl A. Wescott, who is proceeding without an attorney, filed this action against Calvin DOE, Tricia Lo, the Beresford Arms Hotel, and Beresford Corporation. The Court previously granted Wescott’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. (Dkt. No. 5.) It must now review the complaint’s allegations under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS Wescott is a resident of Arizona and bases his complaint on events that allegedly occurred during his stay at the Beresford Arms Hotel in San Francisco, California. Defendants are the Beresford Corporation, the Beresford Arms Hotel (the “Hotel”), and Hotel employees Calvin DOE and Tricia Lo. (Dkt. No. 1 ¶¶ 2-5.) Wescott alleges that during his stay at the Hotel in October of 2021, he raised…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.