Drevaleva
Drevaleva v. Glazer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TATYANA EVGENIEVNA Case No. 21-cv-00500-HSG
DREVALEVA,
ORDER Plaintiff, Re: Dkt. Nos. 92, 93, 97, 99, 104, 106 v. 10 JOSEPH GLAZER, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 On March 14, 2022, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint with prejudice. 13 Dkt. No. 90. Plaintiff has since filed six motions. Dkt. Nos. 92, 93, 97, 99, 104, 106. The Court 14 reemphasizes that this case is closed, and all pending motions are DENIED. No further filings 15 shall be accepted in this closed case. Non-compliance with the Court’s orders will result in the 16 revocation of Plaintiff’s e-filing privileges. 17 // 18 // 19 // 20 //
22 1 To the extent Plaintiff’s First Motion to Vacate the Order Dismissing the Case, Dkt. No. 92, is a motion for reconsideration, Plaintiff has failed to make the necessary showing under Federal Rule 23 of Civil Procedure 59 or 60 or Civil Local Rule 7-9, and her motion is therefore DENIED. See American Ironworkers & Erectors, Inc. v. North American Const.…