Zavislak

Zavislak v. Netflix, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20225:21-cv-01811California1,334 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 MARK ZAVISLAK, Case No. 5:21-cv-01811-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER RE MOTION FOR RELIEF

FROM NONDISPOSITIVE PRETRIAL

v. ORDER OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NETFLIX, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 129 Defendant.

13 Plaintiff Mark Zavislak moves for relief from Magistrate Judge Nathanael Cousins’s order denying Zavislak’s motion to compel an additional deposition and additional search and document production. Mot. for Relief from Nondispositive Pretrial Order of Magistrate Judge (“Mot.”), Dkt. No. 129. Having considered Zavislak’s arguments, the Court REMANDS the issue to the Magistrate Judge for further consideration. I. BACKGROUND In this action, Zavislak asserts claims for monetary damages and injunctive relief for Netflix’s alleged failure to supply information requested pursuant to § 104(b)(4) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1024(b)(4). Dkt. No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.