Gomez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANDRES GOMEZ, Case No. 21-cv-07085-SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

v. CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER

PAULO CORRO, et al., JURISDICTION AND VACATING

APRIL 7, 2022 CASE MANAGEMENT

Defendants. CONFERENCE

13 In an order filed March 24, 2022, the Court directed plaintiff Andres Gomez to show cause whether the parties had complied with General Order 56’s requirement of a joint site inspection. On March 30, plaintiff’s counsel filed a sworn declaration stating that a joint site inspection was unnecessary because the alleged inaccessibility of defendants’ websites “is a policy violation unrelated to a physical location.” Dkt. No. 31 at 2. The Ninth Circuit has held that “[b]ecause the ADA only covers ‘actual, physical places where goods or services are open to the public, and places where the public gets those goods or services,’ there had to be ‘some connection…