Hawthorne

Hawthorne v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 11, 20224:17-cv-04960California766 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CARLOS A. HAWTHORNE, Case No. 17-cv-04960-HSG Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL,

v. DENYING REQUEST FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME

A YANEZ, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 83, 84 Defendants. 12 Plaintiff, an inmate at California Medical Facility, has filed this pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES as moot Plaintiff’s request for an extension of time to oppose defendant Swensen’s motion, Dkt. No. 83, and DENIES Plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel, Dkt. No. 84. Plaintiff has informed the Court that he has been recently transferred to California Medical Facility on or about March 7, 2022, where he has been housed in administrative segregation and does not yet have access to his property or the law library. Dkt. Nos. 83, 84. He states that appointment of counsel is needed because he relies on legal self-manuals to prosecute this case; he …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.