Pumphrey
Pumphrey v. Battles
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TYRONE PUMPHREY, Case No. 21-cv-09005-JSC
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
v. FILE MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
BRANDON BATTLES, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 31 Defendants.
12 Defendants move for leave to file a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s order granting in part and denying in part their motion to dismiss. (Dkt. No. 31; see Dkt. No. 29.)1 After carefully considering the motion, the Court concludes that oral argument is unnecessary, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-9(d), and DENIES the motion as explained below. I. Reconsideration Defendants base their motion on Civil Local Rule 7-9(b)(3), “[a] manifest failure by the Court to consider material facts or dispositive legal arguments which were presented to the Court before such interlocutory order.” Defendants challenge the Court’s conclusion that the County, sued in Plaintiff’s earlier-filed case, and the deputies, sued in the instant case, are not in privity for …