Wescott
Wescott v. Daniel
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CARL WESCOTT, Case No. 21-cv-10011-JCS
Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
v. COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE
DISMISSED
CRAIG DANIEL, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 1 Defendants.
12 I. INTRODUCTION The Court previously granted an application by Plaintiff Carl Wescott, pro se, to proceed in forma pauperis, see dkt. 4,1 and now reviews the sufficiency of Wescott’s complaint against Defendants Craig Daniel; Matthew Gluck; Gordon Atkinson; Justin Sowa; and Gluck Daniel, LLP (the “Firm”) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). For the reasons discussed below, Wescott is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his complaint should not be dismissed with prejudice, by filing a response or amended complaint no later than May 11, 2022. If Wescott does not file a response by that date or fails to cure the defects identified in this order, the case will be reassigned to a United States district judge with a recommendation for dismissal. The case management conference…