Austin v. Miller

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TENISHA TATE-AUSTIN, et al., Case No. 21-cv-09319-MMC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART MILLER DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS; JANETTE C. MILLER, et al., AFFORDING PLAINTIFFS LEAVE TO

AMEND

Defendants.

12 Before the Court is defendants Miller and Perotti Real Estate Appraisals, Inc. 13 (“MPREA”) and Janette C. Miller’s (“Miller”) (collectively, “Miller Defendants”) Motion, filed 14 January 14, 2022, to dismiss, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil 15 Procedure, each of the claims asserted against them in plaintiffs Tenisha Tate-Austin, 16 Paul Austin (collectively, the “Austins”), and Fair Housing Advocates of Northern 17 California’s (“FHANC”) complaint. Plaintiffs have filed opposition, to which the Miller 18 Defendants have replied. Having read and considered the papers filed in support of and 19 in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.3

BACKGROUND4

21 FHANC is “a non-profit corporation dedicated to…