Austin v. San Joaquin Superior Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 12, 20224:21-cv-05225California1,308 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN, Case No. 21-cv-05225-JSW

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS AND RESOLVING

OUTSTANDING MOTIONS

SAN JOAQUIN SUPERIOR COURT, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 33, 40, 42, 44, 46 Defendants.

14 Now before the Court for consideration are the motion to dismiss the amended complaint filed by Defendant Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin (“Defendant”). The Court has considered the parties’ papers, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, and it finds the motion is suitable for disposition without oral argument. See N.D. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). The Court GRANTS the Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 33); DENIES Plaintiff’s duplicative motions for judgment (Dkt. Nos. 40, 42); GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to remove his filing at Docket No. 35 which is duplicative of his later filing (Dkt. 44); and DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to amend the schedule as moot (Dkt. No. 46). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.