Roberts
Roberts v. Bloom Energy Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JAMES EVERETT HUNT, et al., Case No. 19-cv-02935-HSG
Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
CERTIFY ORDER FOR
v. INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL
BLOOM ENERGY CORPORATION, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 170 Defendants.
12 Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to certify an order for interlocutory appeal. Dkt. No. 170. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court DENIES the motion. I. BACKGROUND The parties are familiar with the facts of this case. In his second amended complaint, Lead Plaintiff James Everett Hunt and additional plaintiffs asserted violations of the federal securities laws under Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933; Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and SEC Rule 10b-5 against Bloom Energy Corporation and certain of its top officials…